Judge accused of helping immigrant avoid courthouse arrest loses 1st Circuit bid to stop prosecution
BY Certified Paralegal Michael Saunders at Affordable Paralegal Services
A federal appeals court has refused to block the prosecution of a Massachusetts judge and her courtroom deputy, who were accused of helping an immigrant evade arrest by immigration officials.
The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at Boston ruled Monday against Judge Shelley Richmond Joseph of the Newton District Court and courtroom deputy Wesley MacGregor. The appeals court said Joseph and MacGregor were not entitled to appeal before trial.
Joseph and MacGregor were charged in April 2019 with conspiracy to obstruct justice, aiding and abetting obstruction of justice, and aiding and abetting obstruction of a federal proceeding. MacGregor was also charged with perjury.
Joseph was accused of helping an immigrant appearing before her evade arrest by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in April 2018 by concocting a ruse, the appeals court said. The immigrant would supposedly go downstairs to the lockup to retrieve property after his release following the court hearing. MacGregor then used his access card to allow the immigrant to leave through the back door.
An ICE officer had been waiting in Joseph’s courtroom, but a clerk told him to leave based on Joseph’s direction. The clerk said the immigrant would leave through the courthouse lobby if he was released after the hearing. Because of Joseph’s plan, the immigrant never passed through the lobby, prosecutors said.
The immigrant had been charged with possession of narcotics and being a fugitive from justice in Pennsylvania. A check of a national law enforcement database had indicated that the immigrant was deported twice and was banned from reentering the United States.
Joseph had argued that she was protected by the doctrine of judicial immunity. She and MacGregor also argued that their prosecution was barred by principles of federalism and due process and by 10th Amendment precedent that bars the federal government from commandeering state officials to execute federal policies.
The appeals court said federal law generally permits appeals courts to rule only after final decisions. One exception known as the collateral-order doctrine allows appeals of orders that can’t effectively be reviewed at the end of the case.
The appeals court said none of Joseph’s and MacGregor’s arguments, including the judicial immunity argument, falls within the exception that allows appellate review.
“Judicial immunity — even assuming that it applies in this criminal case — does not provide a right not to be tried that can serve as a basis for interlocutory review,” the appeals court said in an opinion by Judge William J. Kayatta Jr.
“The bottom line then is that we have no jurisdiction to review the district court’s decision denying Judge Joseph’s motion to dismiss based on her asserted common law defense of judicial immunity,” the appeals court said.
The defendants’ 10th Amendment claim “fares no better as a support for interlocutory review,” the appeals court said.
“True, Judge Joseph and Deputy MacGregor will confront the costs of trial and the very significant anxiety of being defendants in a federal prosecution. Without minimizing those adverse consequences, we must recognize that they are visited on all criminal defendants. So they cannot justify an interlocutory appeal unless we are to allow such appeals of most motions to dismiss in criminal cases.”
Several publications had coverage of the opinion, including Law.com, Law360 and Reuters. The Volokh Conspiracy had opinion highlights, while How Appealing linked to the decision.
Mr. Michael Saunders, C.P.
Website: https://www.affordableparalegalservices.org
Office Phone No.: (800) 820–1226
Email: msaunders@affordableparalegalservices.org
Hi. My name is Michael Saunders, and I am a Certified Paralegal, offering Affordable Clerical Paralegal Services to Attorneys. I offer Research, Document-Formatting, Transcription, Proof-Reading, Printing, along with Document Retrieval and Filing Services.
My services include, but are not limited to the following:
• Transcribing & Formatting Pleadings to be Filed with Courts
• Depositions Summarized & Analyzed
• Preparing & Responding to Correspondence
• Drafting Demand Letters
• Legal Research & Preparing Legal Memoranda
• Billing and Bookkeeping
• Remote/Virtual
• On-Site (Depending)
• File Pick-up & Drop-Off
• Court Runners
• Process Service
• Investigative Services
Between 2012 and 2015, I worked under the supervision of Lawyer David Morgan, Esq. Mr. Morgan and I did our fair share of civil rights litigation, suing agents of the Government in their official and individual capacities, for injunctions and money damages. I would conduct investigations for Mr. Morgan, secure Affidavits, draft pleadings (Complaints, Answers and Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Replies, Motions for Summary Judgment and Responses Thereto, Motions to Dismiss and Responses Thereto, Motions to Quash Service, Motions to Strike, Motions to Compel, Motions for Attorney’s Fees, Motions in Limine, Notice of Removal and Motions to Remand), conduct discovery (Interrogatories, Requests for Production, Requests for Admissions, Deposition Summaries, Preparation for Depositions, and Motions to Compel Discovery) and prepare responses and objections to motions filed by the other-side, until the final settlement agreement, or pursue the matter via direct appeal.
I learned and worked hands on in criminal defense, from assisting in representing clients from their Arraignment and initial Bond-Hearing, preparing motions and responses to them, and drafting Appellate Court documents, such as the Opening Brief, Brief in Opposition, as well as the Reply Brief. I have obtained extensive experience with the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to both 28 U.S.C. 2254 and 2255, along with Civil Rights Litigation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983.
In 2016, I worked exclusively for The Lex Group where I learned Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat formatting techniques for Courts all around the Country, in addition to learning how to assure that all documents formatted in those Local, State, and Federal Courts conformed with those Court’s Local and Supreme Court Rules. I am thoroughly trained and highly skilled in Westlaw®, Lexis® and other cutting-edge research tools to provide our attorney-clients with the most comprehensive and efficient legal research on any issue.
I have successfully assisted many attorneys enforce Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which bans employers from discriminating against employees or job applicants on the basis race, color, or national origin, before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and in the Federal Courts. I have also assisted customers who have been presented with a foreclosure action, and clients who have needed a Motion for Relief of Stay or an Adversarial Complaint regarding a bankruptcy case.
Since then, I have been working as an independent Certified Paralegal enabling attorneys’ access to quality paralegal services with affordable hourly rates so they too can enjoy the benefits of having a skilled, professional, and timely Paralegal to take the minutia of the law out the picture so they can spend time focusing on the issues so that justice can prevail on the merits!
In 2019 I became an Associate Member of the American Bar Association; proudly “Defending Liberty and Pursuing Justice.” In 2020 I became a Member of the National Bar Association.
Any publication I produce is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information regarding the subject matter covered. It is based upon sources believed to be accurate and reliable and is intended to be current as of the time it was written. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person must be sought. Also, to confirm that the information has not been affected or changed by recent developments, traditional legal research techniques should be used, including checking primary sources where appropriate. Terms and Conditions apply. Thank you in advance for your consideration. No paying of a retainer then getting a bill when your case is over with.
Mr. Michael Saunders, C.P.
Website: https://affordableparalegalservices.org
Office Phone No.: (800) 820–1226
Email: msaunders@affordableparalegalservices.org
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paralegalsolutions
Quora: https://www.quora.com/q/affordableparalegalservices
Tumbler: https://affordableparalegalservices.tumblr.com
Feel free to email or call at your convenience. I hope that I can be of service.
OCPA No.: 54334325 https://paralegalmichaelsaunders.com
Tags:
#paralegals #paralegal #paralegallife #lawfirm #legal #paralegalproblems #attorney #legalassistant #lawyers #law #paralegaljobs #lawfirms #paralegalservices #lawyer #paralegalsrock #paralegalstudent #paralegalteam #legalservices #attorneys #paralegalstudies #virtualparalegal #lawyerlife #paralegalsofinstagram #personalinjury #paralegallyblonde #litigation #paralegalcommunity #paralegalstyle #virtualassistant #bhfyp #paralegalpresents #paralegalspecialist #paralegalsdoitbest #lawfirmlife #lawfirmmarketing #lawfirmdesign #lawfirmanniversary #paralegalbrampton #lawfirmproblems #lawfirmadvertising #lawfirmlondon #lawfirmlyf #legalmarketingtips #lawfirmjobs #legalmarketing #newyork #mobilenotary #notaryservice #barrister #futurelawyer #paralegalprobz #lawyersofinstagram #lawoffice #work #barristers #lifeofaparalegal #attorneyproblems #legaldocumentpreparation #jurisprudence #armenhyl
Disclaimer on Affordable Paralegal Services: I am a Non-Lawyer not authorized to practice law, and we cannot create a client-attorney-relationship. I have credentials, proof of identity, and writing samples available upon request. Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein — and your interpretation of it — is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website authors, contributors, contributing law firms, or committee members and their respective employers.
